Despite the Supreme Court clarification affirming Senators Andy Uba, Stella Oduah and eight others as members of the National Assembly, the Chris Uba faction has again demanded that they be issued with certificates of return by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC to facilitate their mandate to the National Assembly.
The faction demanded that the certificates of return sustaining Andy Uba, Stella Oduah and eight others be voided by INEC to enable them make replacements in the National Assembly on the ground that they were the authentic candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, who won the National Assembly elections in the affected senatorial districts and federal constituencies in Anambra State.
In a fresh strongly worded letter to the INEC chairman, Prof. Mahmoud Yakubu, the Chris Uba faction maintained that there was no court order upon which the membership of the Andy Uba, Stella Oduah and others in the National Assembly can be sustained.
The letter titled: “Striking out of INEC application to Supreme Court for judgement clarification and request to issue certificates of return to our clients”, dated February 24, 2016, was written by their lawyer, Mr. Anthony Ozioko of the Law Rescue firm in Abuja.
The letter reads in part: “Our previous correspondence dated February 10, 2016 wherein we complained of the impropriety of the application for clarification of judgement at the Supreme Court refers:
“You may recall that we urged you sir, to use your good office to withdraw the motion that was pending at the Supreme Court in view of the fact that there is no ambiguity in the judgment that required clarification.
“We are pleased to inform you that on 24th of February, 2016, the INEC motion for clarification came up at the Supreme Court for hearing and the Supreme Court upheld our client’s preliminary objection that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain such a motion.
“The motion was struck out and the court maintained that there was no ambiguity in its judgement of January 29, 2016
“In view of the foregoing, the coast is now clear for our clients to be issued with certificates of return to go to the Senate as there is nothing hindering your commission from complying with orders of court and issuing our clients with their certificates of return.
“Therefore, we request your good office to toe the honourable path and follow the due process of law, and issue our clients with their certificates of return without any further delay.
“We shall forward to you in due course a copy of the Supreme Court order striking out the INEC motion.”
The letter condemned the media for allegedly misinterpreting the Supreme Court decision of February 24, 2016 to the effect that the elections of Andy Uba, Stella Oduah and eight others were affirmed by the Supreme Court, describing the media action as a propaganda.
The letter further read in part: “Unfortunately, the media is awash with a propaganda that the Supreme Court ruled that its judgement did not sack Senator Andy Uba and others.
“This propaganda is cheap and can only mislead half educated or uninformed minds.
“The Supreme Court did not entertain the INEC motion, it struck it out for lack of jurisdiction to interpret or clarify a judgement it already delivered.
“Can a court that did not hear a matter for lack of jurisdiction make any order on it?” the letter queried.
It further reads: “This misleading propaganda is calculated to hoodwink INEC into remaining in error in respect of the Supreme Court judgement and the subsisting order of the Federal High Court
“For the avoidance of doubt, the Supreme Court judgment of 29th January, 2016 which set aside the Court of Appeal judgment that brought in Senator Andy Uba and others is still intact the way it was delivered.
“The Court of Appeal judgment that made INEC to publish the names of Senator Andy Uba and others, and issued them with certificates of return remains set aside by the Supreme Court judgment in SC.37/2015
“Finally, we request without further delay your issuance of certificates of return to our clients who are the authentic candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, which won the National Assembly elections in the affected federal constituencies and senatorial districts in Anambra State.”
The Supreme Court had on February 24, the day the letter of Chris Uba was written, declined to review its judgment delivered on the 29th of January in favour of the Ejike Oguebego led Executive Committee of the PDP in Anambra State.
The court claimed that the judgment was clear and unambiguous as it relates to the leadership of PDP in the state only and not on any other issue that was not brought before the court for adjudication by the affected parties.


Ad:See How you can turn $500 into $10,000 Click HERE For Details.
SHARE