• Ifeanyi Dike slumps in court

  • He raped and murdered eight year old girl named Chikamso

  • His counsel plead for mental examination to be carried out on him to ascertain his mental status

  • A He was arraigned alongside two other suspect

A high Court room sitting in River state was on Friday thrown in to confusion as child rapist and murderer Ifeanyi Dike slumps after his case was mentioned, thereafter refused to take his plea.

The trial of suspected ritualist commenced on Friday at the Rivers State High Court Number 9, where he was arraigned before judge, Adolphus Enebeli.

READ ALSO  Naira forces Nigerian pilgrims to cut down on spending

Ifeanyi Dike allegedly murdered late eight-year old girl, Chikamso Favour, in August 2017, after raping her and harvesting her genitals.

Also arraigned before Mr. Enebeli are: Ogochukwu Nnamiro (second accused person) and Johnbosco Okoroeze, a police officer (third accused person). They were arraigned as accessories after the fact.

Following the drama played out by the suspect, His counsel, Lizinna Ameegua, urged the court to order that a mental examination be carried out on him to ascertain his mental status. The judge declined the request.

READ ALSO  Labour seeks benchmark for minimum wage

The court entered a plea of not guilty for him, while the second and third accused persons pleaded not guilty.

The matter was adjourned to January 16, 26 and 29, 2018 for definite hearing. Mr. Enebeli said the matter would be heard on a day to day basis.

Earlier in the court, counsel to Mr. Dike, Lizinna Ameegua, raised objection to the trial on the ground that the information filed by the prosecution was incomplete.

READ ALSO  110 killed, 350 injured in India’s temple fire

He urged the court to discharge the first accused person. The court dismissed the request.

Addressing journalists after the adjournment, Rivers State Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice, Emmanuel Aguma said he expects the case to be heard expeditiously.

He said that no party in the case is entitled to more than three adjournments in the course of the hearing.

 

 


Loading...
loading...
SHARE